#287·Runtime v9300 Upgrade On Polkadot

The proposal aims to upgrade Polkadot’s runtime to v9300. More information about the release can be found on the link in this post. As the external queue can only hold one proposal at a time, yesterday's motion 286, removing the limits on members in nomination pools, deleted previously approved motion 285 aiming to upgrade Polkadot's runtime. This new proposal replaces motion 285.

Runtime

• [S] ✅ audited #12170 Low - Pallet-identity: be more paranoid ;)
• [S] ⏳ pending non-critical audit #12222 Low - Add constfeemultiplier to the transaction payment pallet
• [S] ⏳ pending non-critical audit #11981 Low - Breaking: rename call & event
• [S] ✅ trivial #11738 Low - Add inspect trait for asset roles
• [S] ⏳ pending non-critical audit #11806 Low - Improve base weights consistency and make sure they're never zero
• [S] ✅ trivial #12205 Low - Add special tag to exclude runtime storage items from benchmarking
• [S] ⏳ pending non-critical audit #12034 Low - [feature] part 1: add targetlist for validator ranking
• [S] ✅ trivial #12186 Low - Contracts: use weakboundedvec for instrumented code
• [P] #5535 Low - Runtime/disputes: slashing
• [S] ✅ trivial #12258 Low - Breaking: rename origin
• [S] #12230 Low - Bound staking storage items
• [S] ✅ trivial #12083 Low - Make automatic storage deposits resistant against changing deposit prices
• [S] ✅ trivial #12283 Low - Rename anonymous to pure proxy
• [P] ✅ trivial #6037 Low - Increase blockhashcount parameter
• [S] ⏳ pending non-critical audit #12329 Low - Add base-weight to system::extrinsic* events
• [P] ✅ trivial #6032 Low - Paras: unblock offboarding when pvf-check concludes
• [S] ⏳ pending non-critical audit #12366 Low - [feature] add deposit to fast-unstake
• [P] #6050 Low - Add fast-unstsake pallet to all runtimes
• [S] ⏳ pending non-critical audit #12277 Low - Add storage size component to weights

Proposal hash: 0xf1eeaa09f9a85633cf7f1fa588bf3247a58acf9f4cb3e8e12350833c595bc7d3

You can review the hash and changes in the release notes and use SRTool to verify proposal hash - make sure to vote at your convenience! This proposal is submitted as an external motion: meaning after Council vote, the community will need to vote on the proposal in referenda queue.