Hey everyone,
As a follow up today I would like to resubmit the BigTipper #7 previously approved by the community.
This Tip proposal BigTipper #7 was submitted for MathCrypto by me, related to his work on the batch delegate webpage. The Tip was submitted through OpenGov at a time where OpenGov was just kicking off in Kusama with a submission deposit (non-refundable) very high (100 KSM).
Like other proposals submitted around the same time, the enactment period was erroneous set. Because of that, the proposal was one of the recently cancelled by Referendum #122.
This new proposal aims to resubmit the Tip previously approved by the community plus (similar to what other proposals did when submitting the replacement proposals) the reimbursement value of the submission deposit that was locked in the previous proposal BigTipper #7.
This proposal is made of a batch call with two treasury spend calls:
Thank you for your votes and please feel free to leave your comments below.
Best,
paulo // turboflakes.io
Hey everyone,
As a follow up today I would like to resubmit the BigTipper #7 previously approved by the community.
This Tip proposal BigTipper #7 was submitted for MathCrypto by me, related to his work on the batch delegate webpage. The Tip was submitted through OpenGov at a time where OpenGov was just kicking off in Kusama with a submission deposit (non-refundable) very high (100 KSM).
Like other proposals submitted around the same time, the enactment period was erroneous set. Because of that, the proposal was one of the recently cancelled by Referendum #122.
This new proposal aims to resubmit the Tip previously approved by the community plus (similar to what other proposals did when submitting the replacement proposals) the reimbursement value of the submission deposit that was locked in the previous proposal BigTipper #7.
This proposal is made of a batch call with two treasury spend calls:
Thank you for your votes and please feel free to leave your comments below.
Best,
paulo // turboflakes.io