OG Tracker

Big Spender
6mos ago
14 Comments
Rejected

The purpose of this proposal is to expand ogtracker.io on Kusama.

OG Tracker is a tool that tracks deliverables and the ongoing progress of OpenGov approved proposals and displays its findings in a user-friendly and easy to navigate interface.

Read the full proposal here

Thank you.

Reply
Up
Share
Request
5,559.3KSM
Status
Decision14d
Confirmation2d
Attempts
0
Tally
0.1%Aye
50.0%Threshold
99.9%Nay
Aye
95.03KSM
Nay
157.66KKSM
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(0.02%)
2.75KKSM
Issuance
14.86MKSM
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Call
Metadata
Timeline4
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

Did you get or planning to get grant for same purpose on Polkadot

Its 3-4 proposals per month on Kusama, you just copy code and model from Polkadot. It's ok to get paid , but this is too much!

I vote NAY for now

Reply
Up

Screenshot 2024-06-18 at 12.18.00.png

Reply
Up

Voted Nay. My reasoning is here: https://x.com/bitfalls/status/1803894195167596741

Reply
Up

经过AIWeb3 的Twitter Space讨论和社区反馈意见,AIWeb3社区决定反对该提案。以下是社区的主要意见:

**业务重复性:**波卡和Kusama上的业务相同,不应同时在两个平台上申请。
成本问题:提案成本较高,社区对其可行性表示怀疑,认为人工方法存在弊端,所需资金也过多。

**提案重要性:**社区大部分人肯定提案的重要性,波卡上面国库提案缺少一个追踪机制,而且也缺少一个问责机制。
实行可行性: 对执行的落地存疑,实现的可能性不大,建议可以在kusama上搞个小资金提案
AIWeb3社区活动信息
我们每周二北京时间早上10点会在AIWeb3 Twitter Space上讨论Kusama的提案,欢迎大家参与讨论。同时,也欢迎大家直接加入我们的Telegram询问任何问题。如果我们对任何提案表达了赞成,AIWeb3社区也会提供中文社区建设的服务和合作,愿意帮项目方一起建设中文社区,希望波卡生态有更多成功的项目。如果被我们拒绝,也不要灰心,我们欢迎申请人代表来我们的推特space分享提案的亮点,同时也有很多其他的Kusama DV可能会支持你们的提案。

AIWeb3 Community Feedback on Proposal
After discussions on AIWeb3's Twitter Space and feedback from the community, the AIWeb3 community has decided to oppose the proposal. Below are the main points from the community:

Business Redundancy:
The same business is being conducted on both Polkadot and Kusama, and it is unnecessary to apply on both platforms simultaneously.

Cost Issues:
The proposal is costly, and the community is skeptical about its feasibility, considering that manual methods have inherent drawbacks and the required funds are excessive.

Proposal Importance:
While the majority of the community acknowledges the importance of the proposal, there is a lack of a tracking mechanism and an accountability system for treasury proposals on Polkadot.

Implementation Feasibility:
There are doubts about the feasibility of the proposal's execution. The community suggests that a smaller funding proposal be tested on Kusama first.

AIWeb3 Community Activity Information
We hold discussions on Kusama proposals every Tuesday at 10 AM Beijing Time on AIWeb3 Twitter Space. Everyone is welcome to join these discussions. Additionally, you are encouraged to join our Telegram group to ask any questions. If we support any proposal, the AIWeb3 community will also provide services and collaboration for building the Chinese community, and we are willing to help project teams establish a Chinese community, hoping for more successful projects in the Polkadot ecosystem.

If your proposal is rejected, don't be discouraged. We welcome proposers to join our Twitter Space to share the highlights of their proposals. There are also many other Kusama DV who might support your proposal.

Reply
Up

Hi. After reading the proposal my vote is negative for the following reasons:
1.- There is an open and similar proposal for Polkadot by the same team.
2.- Since there is already a similar proposal in Polkadot, the estimated time in hours for the development in Kusama looks at least as very high.
3.- Because of the number of existing proposals in Kusama and the cost of carrying it out, I consider that the development of a tool of this type can be postponed for when it is necessary.

Reply
Up