Threshold
There are duplications spendings regarding infrastructure
So I vote NAY
And its not a time for big spendings in such a market conditions, sorry
经过AIWeb3 的Twitter Space讨论和社区反馈意见，AIWeb3社区决定反对该提案。以下是社区的主要意见：
团队没有很好的回复关于和另外一个提案重复申请经费的问题
团队并未联系或者参加AIWeb3的推特space，所以对于团队的可信度有一些怀疑
我们每周二北京时间早上10点会在AIWeb3 Twitter Space上讨论Kusama的提案，欢迎大家参与讨论。同时，也欢迎大家直接加入我们的Telegram询问任何问题。如果我们对任何提案表达了赞成，AIWeb3社区也会提供中文社区建设的服务和合作，愿意帮项目方一起建设中文社区，希望波卡生态有更多成功的项目。如果被我们拒绝，也不要灰心，我们欢迎申请人代表来我们的推特space分享提案的亮点，同时也请记住，有很多其他的Kusama DV可能会支持你们的提案。
AIWeb3 Community Feedback on Proposal
After discussions on AIWeb3's Twitter Space and feedback from the community, the AIWeb3 community has decided to NAY the proposal. Below are the main points from the community:
The team did not adequately respond to concerns about duplicate funding requests related to another proposal.
Additionally, the team has not contacted or participated in the AIWeb3 Twitter Space, raising some doubts about their credibility.
Community Activity Information
We hold discussions on Kusama proposals every Tuesday at 10 AM Beijing Time on AIWeb3 Twitter Space. Everyone is welcome to join these discussions. Additionally, you are encouraged to join our Telegram group to ask any questions. If we support any proposal, the AIWeb3 community will also provide services and collaboration for building the Chinese community, and we are willing to help project teams establish a Chinese community, hoping for more successful projects in the Polkadot ecosystem.
If your proposal is rejected, don't be discouraged. We welcome proposers to join our Twitter Space to share the highlights of their proposals. There are also many other Kusama DV who might support your proposal.
I post this comment in Subsquare because Polkassembly is not working:
After reading the proposal, the comments and responses given by the team, and a explanation about expenditures I do not see any duplication of costs and as a DV I have decided at this time to approve the retroactive funding proposal as it is a common good chain.
I consider could be necessary to create a bounty to review this kind of proposal related with common good chains. The bounty that determines the need for the expenses to be incurred, pre-approves the expenses and establishes the guidelines for retroactive funding of Common Good Chains and in turn evaluates the viability of this type of CG Chains.
Hello, on behalf of the AIWeb3 DAO (the most vibrant Chinese community within the Polkadot ecosystem, with the mission to amplify the voice of the Chinese-speaking community and support Chinese content creators, ensuring it plays a pivotal role in shaping the future of Polkadot), we have discussed this proposal on twitter space but we still have some questions, such as the relationship between this proposal and the 419, is there any duplicate part? What do you want to achieve in this proposal? We sincerely invite you to join our Twitter Space which is held every Tuesday at 10 AM (UTC+8) on our official Twitter: https://x.com/aiweb3dao. Please join our Telegram group if you have any questions, English TG group: https://t.me/aiweb3dao_eng and Chinese TG group: https://t.me/aiweb3dao
您好，我代表AIWeb3 DAO，这个波卡生态中最具活力的中文社区，旨在放大中文社区的声音，支持中文内容创作者，确保其在塑造波卡未来中发挥重要作用。
我们经过初步讨论，对这个提案还有一些不理解的地方，特地邀请你们参加我们的Twitter空间是每周二上午10点（UTC+8）， 在我们的官方推特：https://x.com/aiweb3dao. 。如有任何问题，请加入我们的Telegram讨论：英文Telegram https://t.me/aiweb3dao_eng ， 中文 TG group: https://t.me/aiweb3dao。