First, we want to thank the Kusama community for their recent support on the "Revitalizing Kusama: the DAO hub" proposal. Your feedback was invaluable, and we listened carefully to your questions and suggestions. Several times we were asked if the Virto team would consider making Kreivo a system chain. We've thought about it deeply, and this proposal is our response to that frequently asked question.
Kreivo is parachain made possible by you KSM token holders who supported the Virto t̶e̶a̶m̶DAO, it allows anyone to create and manage autonomous organizations, provides a robust payments infrastructure, smart contracts(for DAOs only), great UX for DAO members not requiring fees nor wallets(supports passkeys), and all of this using KSM as its native token.
Kreivo is an ideal candidate for becoming a system parachain because it provides essential infrastructure for DAOs within the Kusama ecosystem. As a system parachain, Kreivo could offer deeper integration with Kusama's governance, enabling more efficient and seamless operation of DAOs. This would strengthen Kusama's position as a hub for decentralized governance and potentially attract more teams and entrepreneurs to the network.
Moreover, Kreivo's use of KSM as its native token aligns perfectly with Kusama's tokenomics, ensuring that increased activity on Kreivo directly benefits the entire Kusama ecosystem. Read more about Kreivo's sustainability model through the sell of memberships and advanced payment fees.
Kreivo from its conception has already behaved like a system chain, the only big difference being its Root origin was set to be a governance track controlled by a ranked collective formed by all the DAOs registered in the system, a DAO Alliance. After becoming a system chain Kreivo would change its root origin to be the parent chain, requiring future upgrades to be conducted via Kusama OpenGov. However we would still keep the DAO ranked collective and its treasury to oversee certain aspects of the protocol, like the minting and pricing of new memberships or configuring certain system payment fees.
Kreivo is already helping the Kusama ecosystem:
We look forward to your vote and feedback on this proposal.
Threshold
Is it possible to analyze this proposal with a technical team (bounty or collective) that present the pros and cons for having these type of chains as a system chain?
I consider this proposal should no pass for open gov but have a revision of a technical committee or bounty.