Threshold
Dear Proposer,
Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.
The Small Spender track requires 50% participation and simple majority of non-abstain votes according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received three aye and zero nay votes from ten available members, with three members abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:
In the recent referendum, voters expressed a mix of support and hesitation regarding the proposal. Some supported it, viewing the request as modest and beneficial for usability, while others abstained, citing a need for more information and clarity on the project's impact and external validation. Concerns were raised about the lack of responses to previous inquiries, indicating a desire for transparency and assurance before committing to the initiative. Overall, the feedback reflected a cautious yet hopeful outlook on the project's potential benefits.
The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.
Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.
Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate
📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate
Hi @ethernomad,
It's an interesting-sounding approach, but I have two questions:
Overall, my opinion so far is that it can be an interesting piece of technology, but it needs more thinking and a better, more comprehensive design. In its current form, it's not offering too much progress. Please let me know if I'm overlooking any information.
Regards,
kukabi | Helikon
Edited