Counter WFC: More tools for DAOs in AssetHub

Confirming
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Status
Decision14d
Confirmation
1d
Attempts
1
Tally
72.9%Aye
27.1%Nay
Aye
175.54KKSM
Nay
65.13KKSM
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Support
0.28%
45.43KKSM
Issuance
16.21MKSM
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Actions
Or do delegation here, check wiki.
Call
Metadata
Timeline4
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

PolkaWorld votes AYE

With the growing number of DAOs emerging under the influence of the DV program, developing native DAO modules on AssetHub has become increasingly necessary.

Compared to WFC#535, which attempted to interfere with how W3F and DVs operate, this proposal clearly focuses solely on integrating technical modules, avoiding contentious governance ownership debates — making it easier to reach consensus.

By providing native tooling such as Referenda (voting), NFTs (membership), and Communities (organizational structure), this proposal significantly lowers the barrier for DAOs to implement on-chain governance and identity management on AssetHub. This is especially beneficial for community-driven and smaller DAOs, such as Truth DAO.

Additionally, with the upcoming support for smart contracts, this lays the groundwork for fully on-chain DAO operations in the future — including fund custody, rules enforcement, and access control — offering long-term strategic value for the DAO tooling stack.

You can view our full feedback here.

Reply
Up 1

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is NAY.

The Wish For Change track requires 60% quorum according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received one aye and four nay votes from ten available members, with three members abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

Many members sought clearer explanations and more detailed frameworks, emphasizing the need for further discussion before proceeding. Some voters felt that off-chain tools should be prioritized over complex on-chain solutions, while others questioned the appropriateness of using on-chain referenda for such discussions. However, one voter supported the proposal, viewing it as a reasonable step towards enhancing on-chain governance and identity management for decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate

Edited

Reply
Up