WFC: From 1000 to 500 Validators: Higher Rewards, Lower Inflation, Stronger Network

Preparing
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Status
Prepare Period2hrs
Waiting for Decision Deposit
Tally
0%Aye
100%Nay
Aye
50KSM
Nay
β‰ˆ177.09KKSM
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Support
0.00%
β‰ˆ54.58KSM
Issuance
β‰ˆ16.21MKSM
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Actions
Or do delegationΒ here, check wiki.
Call
Metadata
Timeline1
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

A temporary reduction in capacity makes sense when demand is so low, that includes validators and cores(if hoarding is fixed), we could go even lower if it means we can adjust inflation to attractive values while maintaining validators profitable. In the long term however Kusama should keep its welcoming spirit and low entry barrier that allows small players to participate in the network, JAM might also change the mechanics but let's leave that for the future and fix the issues we have today.

Reply
Up

I share Bill's sentiment

Reply
Up

PolkaWorld votes NAY

While we support the idea of reducing inflation and increasing validator rewards in principle, this proposal raises concerns about the reduction in validator count also limiting the number of available cores.

Although current demand from parachains is not high, permanently fixing the validator set at 500 could become a bottleneck as the network scales. We don’t see this as a sustainable long-term solution.

That said, the proposal introduces an important topic for discussion, and we encourage the community to build on it with further dialogue and refinement.

Read all feedback here.

Reply
Up