WFC: Agree that coretime is not a viable revenue model for Kusama and encourage the development of radical new approaches for burning KSM and alternative mechanisms for accruing value to the canarys treasury account as part of the move to becoming a free-thinking cousin of Polkadot.

Preparing
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Status
Prepare Period2hrs
Waiting for Decision Deposit
Tally
31.2%Aye
68.8%Nay
Aye
42.49KKSM
Nay
93.54KKSM
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Support
0.09%
13.87KKSM
Issuance
16.21MKSM
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Actions
Or do delegation here, check wiki.
Call
Metadata
Timeline1
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

Coretime has never been designed to be a viable revenue model, nor for Kusama neither Polkadot.
No one from the builders who designed it never said such a thing.
Some random lost guys in the community who believed Coretime will make DOT/KSM pump by burning millions of DOT/KSM raised that point, and only them.

So Coretime shouldn't even be mentioned in this WFC.
What are the new approaches and mechanisms you are talking about? You don't even bring a single detailed solution...

So please, can you stop spamming OpenGov?
You're starting to be really really tiring.

If you want open discussions and brainstorm about solutions, use the Polkadot forum.

Reply
Up

PolkaWorld votes NAY

WFC proposals should come with concrete solutions — not just vague directions or spur-of-the-moment ideas.
We recommend that proposals like this be first shared on the Polkadot forum to gather community feedback, and only then refined into actionable, well-structured WFC submissions.

Read all feedback here.

Reply
Up