Threshold
Dear Proposer,
Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.
The Big Spender track requires 60% quorum according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received five aye and zero nay votes from eight available members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:
Members supported the proposal and highlighted Subscan’s indispensable role within the ecosystem. They noted that the tool had been critical in managing and indexing blockchain data, which enabled reliable, real-time access to essential information for developers, validators, and users alike. They emphasized that Subscan remained necessary for maintaining operational stability and overall performance. The requested funds were seen as a crucial investment in ensuring uninterrupted infrastructure support for the Kusama Relaychain and public parachains. Collectively, their comments underlined a strong belief in the platform’s continued value and its vital contribution to sustaining the growth and security of the network.
The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.
Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.
Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate
📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate
Threshold
TOO EXPENSIVE!