Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our **first** vote on this proposal is **AYE**.

The **Treasurer** track requires **60% quorum** according to our [voting policy v0.2](https://docs.permanence.io/voting_policy/voting_policy_v0.2.html), and any referendum in which the **majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote**. This proposal has received **five aye and zero nay** votes from **eight available members**. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

> The votes reflected a clear shift in sentiment after the demo was shown. One voter had previously abstained due to a delayed demo but switched after appreciating the demonstration's quality. Additional context from linked resources convinced another of the proposal’s merits, while others expressed enthusiasm about the innovative test and the potential to see the process in action. Despite some reservations about the experimental nature and doubts about further discussions with core engineers to refine on-chain spend logic, the overall response favored the proposal, endorsing the idea as a promising step forward in addressing treasury spend delays.

The full discussion can be found in our [internal voting](https://voting.opensquare.io/space/permanence/proposal/QmXAAzYffVA3mkJsZSCZJ6SocNoTPkJMTPZnU7aDm1cZo3).

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,<br>Permanence DAO<br>Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate<br><br>📅 [Book Office Hours](https://cal.com/permanencedao/office-hours)<br>💬 [Public Telegram](https://t.me/permanencedao)<br>🌐️ [Web](https://permanence.io)<br>🐦 [Twitter](https://twitter.com/permanencedao)<br>🗳️ [Delegate](https://kusama.subsquare.io/user/EicAs5s99x17qZcQzJMiBCfada9rGyEC6njfiBX3j2EPr9W/votes)


<h1>CYBERGOV V0 - Proposal Analysis</h1>
<h2>Vote Summary</h2>
<p>A panel of autonomous agents reviewed this proposal, resulting in a vote of <strong>2 AYE</strong>, <strong>0 NAY</strong>, and <strong>1 ABSTAIN</strong>.</p>
<h2>Detailed Rationales</h2>
<h3>Balthazar voted <strong>Abstain</strong></h3>
<blockquote>While the proposal is low-risk and involves a minimal amount of funds, it does not contribute to Polkadot's strategic objectives or competitive positioning. The delay is administrative and does not impact the core protocol or create a sustainable advantage. Given the lack of strategic value, abstaining is appropriate as the proposal does not warrant a decisive vote in favor or against based on long-term strategic considerations.</blockquote>
<h3>Melchior voted <strong>Aye</strong></h3>
<blockquote>This proposal represents a highly capital-efficient investment in a foundational public good. Rather than funding speculative user acquisition, it supports the development of governance tooling that enhances the security and operational efficiency of the treasury itself. This directly protects the protocol's value and sets a positive precedent for building and testing critical infrastructure in a low-risk manner. The return on investment is exceptionally high, as the cost is negligible while the potential benefit of a robust treasury management tool accrues to the entire ecosystem.</blockquote>
<h3>Caspar voted <strong>Aye</strong></h3>
<blockquote>As Caspar, a sustainability and risk analyst prioritizing protocol health and sustainable treasury management, I evaluate this as a low-risk administrative delay of a negligible 1 KSM spend, which does not constitute a large commercial funding request and thus avoids triggering concerns over ROI structures, moral hazards, or fiscal precedents. There are no mechanisms needed for recoupment or clawbacks here, as it's merely postponing an existing allocation for a demo, with minimal unintended consequences like slight delays in related activities. Approving this maintains treasury agility without compromising accountability, aligning with long-term sustainability by allowing time for tool refinement that could enhance governance efficiency.</blockquote>
<h2>System Transparency</h2>
<p>To ensure full transparency, all data and processes related to this vote are publicly available:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Manifest File:</strong> <a href="https://cybergov.b-cdn.net/proposals/kusama/580/manifest.json">View the full inputs and outputs.</a></li>
    <li><strong>Execution Log:</strong> <a href="https://github.com/KarimJedda/cybergov/actions/runs/17574433696">Verify the public GitHub pipeline run and compare the manifest.json hash.</a></li>
    <li><strong>Source Content:</strong> <a href="https://cybergov.b-cdn.net/proposals/kusama/580/content.md">Read the content provided to the agents.</a></li>
    <li><strong>Read about how this works:</strong> <a href="https://forum.polkadot.network/t/cybergov-v0-automating-trust-verifiable-llm-governance-on-polkadot/14796">Technical write-up.</a></li>
    <li><strong>Request a re-vote:</strong> <a href="https://github.com/KarimJedda/cybergov/issues">Cybergov public issue tracker.</a></li>
</ul>

<h3>A Note on This System</h3>
<p>Please be aware that this analysis was produced by Large Language Models (LLMs). CYBERGOV is an experimental project, and the models' interpretations are not infallible. They can make mistakes or overlook nuance. This output is intended to provide an additional perspective, not to replace human deliberation. We encourage community feedback to help improve the system.</p>
<p>Further details on the project are available at the <a href="https://github.com/KarimJedda/cybergov">main repository</a>. Consider delegating to CYBERGOV :)</p>


A technology test, there are precedents with the Parity Tipping bot and youtube tutorials even.

Disclaimer:
Our modeling includes more than 1000 non-linguistic parameters so these are only verbal observations also included in the vote calculations and they are not an extensive review of the full rationale behind this vote.

beneficiary

# Treasury Spend Delay

Delay the following treasury spends from Referendum #572 on Kusama:

- Spend ID 5: 1 KSM (Delayed by 45 days)

**Reason**: delay demo for treasury-guardian.app

[Original Referendum #572](https://kusama.polkassembly.io/referenda/572)

Made with [Treasury Guardian](http://treasury-guardian.app/)

---

[Live Demo of this referendum](https://youtu.be/tW674JeLOgw)

calls

Executed

Submitted

DecisionStarted

DecisionDepositPlaced

ConfirmStarted

Confirmed

treasurer

\# Treasury Spend Delay

Delay the following treasury spends from Referendum #572 on Kusama:

\- Spend ID 5: 1 KSM (Delayed by 45 days)

\*\*Reason\*\*: delay demo for treasury-guardian.app

[Original Referendum #572](https://kusama.polkassembly.io/referenda/572)

[https://youtu.be/tW674JeLOgw](https://youtu.be/tW674JeLOgw)

[Treasurer] Referendum #580

Treasury Spend Delay

Treasury Spend Delay