Tip for an account used for Referendum Deposit Clean-up and Validator Payout Bot

Hey Kusamaxi,

The bot was setup many years ago and was not marketed as a the de-facto solution for validator payouts. It offers some economic relief to those who don't want to manage validator payouts themselves. Validators can also use this as a backup to their own systems.

I think your points related to downtime are overstated and perhaps if you took an empirical approach you may find downtime is not as bad as you're making it out to be. In any case, if you're unsatisfied, you can just operate your own bot/script.

Regards,

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.

The Small Spender track requires 50% participation and simple majority of non-abstain voters according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received five aye and zero nay votes from ten available members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The votes on the referendum were overwhelmingly supportive, with all voters expressing strong agreement. They highlighted the utility of the funding account for validators and others, finding it beneficial and easy to endorse. Many referenced the positive comments from others, indicating a consensus that there were no valid reasons to oppose the measure. Overall, the feedback reflected a unified approval for the initiative, emphasizing its helpfulness and the alignment of views among the voters.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate