Referendum #572
Treasury Spend #5

#5ยทTreasury Guardian On-Chain Demo

Treasury
6d ago
2
Approved
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
1KSM
Beneficiary
Check the beneficiaryโ†—
Metadata
Timeline1
Comments

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.

The Small Spender track requires 50% participation and simple majority of non-abstain votes according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received five aye and zero nay votes from ten available members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

Voters approved the Treasury Guardian demo, citing its potential to advance milestone-based payouts and streamline treasury operations. They expressed interest in observing the tool's evolution and noted that the experiment was a critical step toward refining on-chain cancellation practices. A few voters mentioned that while the concept was promising, the user interface could benefit from additional improvements. Overall, they perceived the proposal as an innovative approach to enhance transparency and effectiveness in government spending, and they supported the trial phase as a valuable experiment in increasing community involvement and treasury efficiency on both Kusama and Polkadot platforms.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

๐Ÿ“… Book Office Hours
๐Ÿ’ฌ Public Telegram
๐ŸŒ๏ธ Web
๐Ÿฆ Twitter
๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ Delegate

Reply
Up