Short Intro
The current use of social media, Telegram and Discord groups or traditional discussion forums have the following limitations when it comes to OpenGov: Lack of structured debate, Potential for echo chambers, inefficient fragmentation of community discussions into silos, risk of misinformation, no argument visualization, decision making Intransparency etc...
I would like to suggest to implement a new more future proof discussion forum for OpenGov, incl. logical structure for debates, easy identification of pros and cons, clear argument visualization, more diversity of opinion, and the ability to track debate evolution and much more...
Think about how this could improve OpenGov:
https://www.kialo.com/should-the-united-states-have-more-than-two-major-political-parties-15546
I have NO association with the Kialo project in any way.
If you think this could somehow be a useful and valuable addition to improve OpenGov then please vote for it.
Further information’s below.
Problem
Current OpenGov related discussion in Telegram or Discord groups or on X (twitter) , and the traditional discussion forums are not suited for the future. With the current discussion forums/social media and siloed telegram and discord groups, an open informed discussion is at least very difficult if not impossible.
Firstly lets start with the limitations for traditional discussion forums when it comes to OpenGov:
Secondly let’s look at social media. X (twitter) threads/AMAs or Telegram and Discord group discussions offer significant value for community building, real-time communication, and sometimes in small groups topic-specific discussions.
But they have in addition to the previously mentioned limitations these, when it comes to OpenGov:
Solution
We should aim for a discussion forum designed to facilitate structured, thoughtful discussion on a wide range of topics.
The discussions should also be in a clear, tree-like structure, making it easy to follow the logical flow of arguments and counterarguments.
It should offer a unique debate format that allows users to constructively explore arguments for and against various positions, with the aim of promoting critical thinking and a deeper understanding of complex issues.
The setup should encourages users to contribute thoughtfully and to consider multiple perspectives, enhancing the quality of discourse on the platform.
The discussion platform should integrate a system for tracking and reflecting changes in consensus, allowing users to see how opinions evolve over time.
We should be fostering structured and focused debates, and significantly enhancing the quality of online discussions.
Features which could be included in a new discussion forum:
Please have a look at the following link, and think about how this could improve OpenGov.
This could be the example which could be adjusted/customized for OpenGov/subsquare/polkassembly.
I have NO association with the Kialo project in any way.
The following link shows how it could look like… this is a real discussion on their page.
Be curious click around, there is a lot to discover.
https://www.kialo.com/should-the-united-states-have-more-than-two-major-political-parties-15546
Amazing is the interactive Discussion Topology pie chart (pie chart icon at the top), with all the pro and con arguments and how they lead to the main thesis in the middle.
Also great is the interactive tree of pro and con arguments, starting with a central thesis. This layout helps to visualize and navigate through complex issues clearly, with arguments supporting or attacking the thesis and each other in a hierarchical manner.
And much more…
Next Steps:
I would like to suggest to implement an improved decision forum as roughly described, which could be adjusted/customized for OpenGov/subsquare/polkassembly.
Initially we could have both the old and a new tab for the new forum and test the new forum e.g. first only for certain Origins/Tracks . We could still go on discussing on X or Telegram/Discord etc, but all major arguments for or against a proposal, should then also be mentioned in the new forum, to be able to get the opinion from others and increase transparency.
At first it may be additional complexity, but I think it could be a good approach for the future of OpenGov.
And Yes there is the risk of lack of user adoption, engagement and participation. The new structured format, while beneficial for clarity, may be intimidating or confusing for new users, but there is also the chance that this improves OpenGov significantly over time.
And Yes, for most of the proposals such a discussion forum seems too much for now, just some are highly debated, but this will most likely change in the future. The amount of users and people who want to participate in OpenGov may be relatively small now, but will increase over time. People will get used to it, it has so much more advantages for OpenGov compared to Telegram and Discord or traditional discussion forums.
Again we need to improve the way we discuss topics on OpenGov with logical structures for debates, easy identification of pros and cons, clear argument visualization, more diversity of opinion, and the ability to track debate evolution and much more...The Decision-Tree and interactive Discussion Topology Pie chart and the easy accessibility and overview of proposal discussions and arguments, could also lead to more user engagement.
We need to provide an attractive discussion platform and benefit from the diversity of voters.
If you think this could be a useful and valuable addition to improve OpenGov then please vote for it.
I’m looking forward to your comments and suggestions
or best practices of how to eventually proceed?
Thank you!