Threshold
Dear Proposer,
Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.
The Big Spender track requires 60% quorum according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received six aye and zero nay votes from ten available members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:
The voters expressed unanimous support for a proposal regarding system parachains, emphasizing the importance of incentivizing collator operators and rewarding their self-stake. They believed that fostering a competitive market for collators would lead to lower costs and enhance the overall system. The general consensus highlighted the necessity of supporting collators to ensure the success and efficiency of the parachain ecosystem.
The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.
Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.
Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate
📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate
PolkaWorld votes AYE
The requested budget is reasonable and well-documented. For example, each collator has a reward cap of $300/month, conditional on achieving a 100% block production rate. Nodes that miss blocks will have their rewards proportionally reduced. All payouts are tracked via a child bounty system, ensuring strong transparency and accountability.
Full feedback available here.